- 收听数
- 0
- 性别
- 保密
- 听众数
- 23
- 最后登录
- 2024-2-19
- QQ
 - UID
- 2826
- 阅读权限
- 40
- 帖子
- 2223
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 2729 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-27
- 科研币
- 26
- 速递币
- 22350
- 娱乐币
- 2910
- 文献值
- 903
- 资源值
- 10
- 贡献值
- 0
|
速递书局
| 封面: |
 |
| 题名: |
Natural Law in Court |
| 作者: |
Helmholz, R.H. |
| 出版社: |
Harvard University Press |
| 出版日期: |
2015 |
| ISBN: |
9780674504592 |
| 附属页: |
齐全 |
| 书签: |
有 |
| 格式: |
清晰PDF |
| 内容简介: |
The theory of natural law grounds human laws in the universal truths of God’s creation. Until very recently, lawyers in the Western tradition studied natural law as part of their training, and the task of the judicial system was to put its tenets into concrete form, building an edifice of positive law on natural law’s foundations. Although much has been written about natural law in theory, surprisingly little has been said about how it has shaped legal practice. Natural Law in Court asks how lawyers and judges made and interpreted natural law arguments in England, Europe, and the United States, from the beginning of the sixteenth century to the American Civil War.
R. H. Helmholz sees a remarkable consistency in how English, Continental, and early American jurisprudence understood and applied natural law in cases ranging from family law and inheritance to criminal and commercial law. Despite differences in their judicial systems, natural law was treated across the board as the source of positive law, not its rival. The idea that no person should be condemned without a day in court, or that penalties should be proportional to the crime committed, or that self-preservation confers the right to protect oneself against attacks are valuable legal rules that originate in natural law. From a historical perspective, Helmholz concludes, natural law has advanced the cause of justice. |
| 求助帖链接: |
http://www.expaper.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=91901 |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？快速注册
-
总评分: 速递币 + 50
文献值 + 2
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2015-6-22 00:07:27
淘帖
收藏
顶
踩
