- 收听数
- 0
- 性别
- 男
- 毕业学校
- 北京林业大学
- 听众数
- 5
- 最后登录
- 2024-4-13
- 学历
- 硕士
- QQ
 - UID
- 1593
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 7189
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 7041 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-11-24
  
- 科研币
- 350
- 速递币
- 5736
- 娱乐币
- 10399
- 文献值
- 1358
- 资源值
- 20
- 贡献值
- 11
|
速递书局
| 封面: |
 |
| 题名: |
The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government |
| 作者: |
Richard A. Epstein |
| 出版社: |
Harvard University Press |
| 出版日期: |
January 2014 |
| ISBN: |
9780674724891 |
| 附属页: |
齐全 |
| 书签: |
有 |
| 格式: |
清晰PDF |
| 内容简介: |
American liberals and conservatives alike take for granted a progressive view of the Constitution that took root in the early twentieth century. Richard A. Epstein laments this complacency which, he believes, explains America’s current economic malaise and political gridlock. Steering clear of well-worn debates between defenders of originalism and proponents of a living Constitution, Epstein employs close textual reading, historical analysis, and political and economic theory to urge a return to the classical liberal theory of governance that animated the framers’ original text, and to the limited government this theory supports.
Grounded in the thought of Locke, Hume, Madison, and other Enlightenment figures, the classical liberal tradition emphasized federalism, restricted government, separation of powers, property rights, and economic liberties. The most serious challenge to this tradition, Epstein contends, has come from New Deal progressives and their intellectual defenders. Unlike Thomas Paine, who saw government as a necessary evil at best, the progressives embraced government as a force for administering social good. The Supreme Court has unwisely ratified the progressive program by sustaining an ever-lengthening list of legislative programs at odds with the classical liberal Constitution.
Epstein’s carefully considered analysis addresses both halves of the constitutional enterprise: its structural safeguards against excessive government power and its protection of individual rights. He illuminates contemporary disputes ranging from presidential prerogatives to health care legislation, while reexamining such enduring topics as the institution of judicial review, the federal government’s role in regulating economic activity, freedom of speech and religion, and equal protection. |
| 求助帖链接: |
http://www.expaper.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=34507 |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？快速注册
-
总评分: 速递币 + 50
文献值 + 2
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-12-29 15:53:41
淘帖
收藏
顶
踩
发表于 2013-12-29 15:54:55
