- 收听数
- 0
- 性别
- 保密
- 听众数
- 23
- 最后登录
- 2024-2-19
- QQ
 - UID
- 2826
- 阅读权限
- 40
- 帖子
- 2223
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 2729 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-27
- 科研币
- 26
- 速递币
- 22350
- 娱乐币
- 2910
- 文献值
- 903
- 资源值
- 10
- 贡献值
- 0
|
速递书局
| 封面: |
 |
| 题名: |
debating vietnam |
| 作者: |
fry |
| 出版社: |
rowman |
| 出版日期: |
2006 |
| ISBN: |
9780742516421 |
| 附属页: |
齐全 |
| 书签: |
有 |
| 格式: |
清晰PDF |
| 内容简介: |
In the midst of the Vietnam War, two titans of the Senate, J. William Fulbright and John C. Stennis, held public hearings to debate the conflict's future. In this intriguing new work, historian Joseph A. Fry provides the first comparative analysis of these inquiries and the senior southern Senators who led them.
The Senators' shared aim was to alter the Johnson administration's strategy and bring an end to the war—but from dramatically different perspectives. Fulbright hoped to pressure Johnson to halt escalation and seek a negotiated settlement, while Stennis wanted to prompt the President to bomb North Vietnam more aggressively and secure a victorious end to the war. Publicized and televised, these hearings added fuel to the fire of national debate over Vietnam policy and captured the many arguments of both hawks and doves.
Fry details the dramatic confrontations between the Senate committees and the administration spokesmen, Dean Rusk and Robert McNamara, and he probes the success of congressional efforts to influence Vietnam policy. Ultimately, Fry shows how the Fulbright and Stennis hearings provide vivid insight into the debate over why the United States was involved in Vietnam and how the war should be conducted. |
| 求助帖链接: |
http://www.expaper.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=73276&extra=page%3D1 |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？快速注册
-
总评分: 速递币 + 50
文献值 + 2
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2014-11-30 19:22:36
淘帖
收藏
顶
踩
